Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>
>>The problem is that if the postmaster takes more than 60 seconds to
>>start listening (as is apparently happening on spoonbill - don't yet
>>know why) this code falls through.
>>
>>
>
>If the postmaster takes that long to start listening, I'd say we need to
>fix the postmaster not pg_regress.
>
>
>
We need both, I think. I am still trying to find out why it's taking so
long. This is on the 8.0 branch, though. Later branches seem to be working.
>>I'm inclined to run the psql test one more time to make sure we can
>>actually connect, and if not then fail at this point.
>>
>>
>
>How does that differ from just iterating the loop one more time?
>
>
There is no guarantee that at the end of the loop we have connected
successfully to postgres.
I will post a patch that shows what I suggest.
cheers
andrew