Re: More thoughts about planner's cost estimates

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Greg, Tom,
> 
>> But for most users analyze doesn't really have to run as often as
>> vacuum. One sequential scan per night doesn't seem like that big a deal
>> to me.
> 
> Clearly you don't have any 0.5 TB databases.  

Perhaps something like "ANALYZE FULL"?  Then only those who need the
more precise statistics would pay the cost for a full scan.

-- todd