Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Дата
Msg-id 446CD83E.9050901@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  (Lukas Smith <smith@pooteeweet.org>)
Ответы Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Список pgsql-hackers
> I do agree that its probably not worth allocating core resources to 
> this, but spouting outdated FUD is really making you two look foolish.

And which FUD would this be?

> 
> You have to understand that MySQL evolves just like PostgreSQL does. So 
> you better focus on advertising where PostgreSQL shines instead of 
> poking fun at something you apparently do not follow.

Uhmmm, I am not even going to bother responding to this part. It is 
obvious that *you* don't follow MySQL versus PostgreSQL.

No offense but the development models and thus evolution thereof are 
completely different.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> regards,
> Lukas
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
> 


-- 
   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997             http://www.commandprompt.com/
 




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?