Re: psql patch
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psql patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4385.1046108216@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | psql patch ("Jeroen T. Vermeulen" <jtv@xs4all.nl>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psql patch
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
"Jeroen T. Vermeulen" <jtv@xs4all.nl> writes:
> 3. It would be a little extra work, but perhaps not undoable, to keep
> track of whether the client is actually listening on any triggers.
Not without help from the backend --- you have no idea whether a LISTEN
command might have been executed via some user-defined function.
> Similarly, there's no need to
> poll while inside a transaction because no notifications will be
> delivered in that state.
Again, it's not all that easy to be sure if you're inside a transaction
or not. We looked at this and decided it was impractical to do without
a protocol addition.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: