Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
| От | Neil Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4268B0BA.9090808@samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents (Chris Travers <chris@travelamericas.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Software Patents
|
| Список | pgsql-www |
Chris Travers wrote: > Stating that the PostgreSQL community has no position on software > patents is not quite accurate. I think this it's true. Members of the community have various opinions, but AFAIK the project as a whole does not. > Changing the caching algorythm in the middle of a stable branch > (which would otherwise only contain bug fixes) over patent concerns > sends a very loud message Yes, and that message is "PostgreSQL will try to avoid infringing on patents.", or at least will work around the problem when it is brought to our attention. I don't see that it can be interpreted as opposition to software patents per se. -Neil
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: