Re: locks in CREATE TRIGGER, ADD FK
| От | Neil Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: locks in CREATE TRIGGER, ADD FK |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4240EFFD.4090805@samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: locks in CREATE TRIGGER, ADD FK (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: locks in CREATE TRIGGER, ADD FK
Re: locks in CREATE TRIGGER, ADD FK |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Utterly wrong. When you commit you will physically drop the old table. > If there is a SELECT running against the old table it will be quite > unhappy after that. How can we drop the file at commit, given that a serializable transaction's snapshot should still be able to see old relfilenode's content? (If the serializable transaction has already acquired a read lock before the TRUNCATE begins, it will block the TRUNCATE -- but there is no guarantee that the operations will be ordered like that.) -Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: