Re: [HACKERS] Much Ado About COUNT(*)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Richard Huxton
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Much Ado About COUNT(*)
Дата
Msg-id 41E81198.6070105@archonet.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Much Ado About COUNT(*)  ("Frank D. Engel, Jr." <fde101@fjrhome.net>)
Список pgsql-general
Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This is probably stupid for some reason, but why not use a 64-bit
> integer to track the number of records in the table? Increment when
> adding records, decrement when deleting them... then COUNT(*) could just
> return that in cases where a query is known to be looking at all of the
> records?

Check the list archives for details, but you need to consider multiple
backends inserting/deleting concurrently. What you need is a separate
little table where you can log your transaction-id and number of rows
added/removed then you can figure out how many rows there are from
different viewpoints.

--
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: C locale + unicode
Следующее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Much Ado About COUNT(*)