Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Matthew T. O'Connor
Тема Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches
Дата
Msg-id 41896981.2040102@zeut.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Pre-8.0 outstanding patches  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:

>I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta
>period for releases 7.2-7.4.  I have gone though the kept emails and
>found 37 messages that need review:
>
>    http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3
>
>I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1. 
>  
>

I don't see the pg_autovacuum patch that I submitted just after beta4.   
It is my understanding that this patch would be accecpted into 8.0 since 
a) it's a contrib module, b) it's a simple and small patch, and c) 
having autovacuum be aware of the vacuum delay stuff is a good idea.

Matthew



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Hallgren
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: UPDATE is not allowed in a non-volatile function
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches