Re: Issues regarding code license of ported code.

Dave Cramer wrote:
> I'd also like to understand the use of the LPGL license on a postgresql
> interface?
>


Hi all.

When I started this project, I had very little experience about
licenses. I knew that LGPL were created to enable library projects and
so I decided to use it.

Sorry if I did a mistake about that. :(


> I'd go further than saying businesses are ambivalent about GPL, and or
> LPGL; in my experience business's prefer the freebsd license.
>

Yeah, today I know that! :)

I could ask all developers who contributed to project their permission
to change the code to bsd license, but, in IMHO, I think this wouldn't
be necessary, as LGPL fullfills the requirements of Npgsql licensing.


Please, correct me if I'm wrong. ;) I welcome all and any feedback
possible about that.

Regards,

Francisco Figueiredo Jr.