> Currently we have this in plperl.c:
> "require Safe;"
>
> I am thinking of submitting a patch to replace this with "use Safe
> 2.09;" to enforce use of a version without the known vulnerability.
>
> Any objections?
I have none, except will 2.09 work with 5.00503?
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plperlng-devel mailing list
> Plperlng-devel@pgfoundry.org
> http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/plperlng-devel
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL