On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Heikki
Linnakangas<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> The most notable of these is the change to "char" datatype. The patch
> tightens it so that it no longer accepts values >127 with a multi-byte
> database encoding.
That doesn't sound right to me. We accept casts from integer to "char"
for all values in range (-128..127). The question should be what the
text representation should be since the raw bytes aren't valid mb
encodings.
--
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf