Re: max_allowed_packet equivalent in Postgres?
От
Greg Stark
Тема
Re: max_allowed_packet equivalent in Postgres?
Дата
Msg-id
407d949e0908131835w3dc7b936oa4be8cabdaa62416@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: max_allowed_packet equivalent in Postgres? (Sam Mason)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
max_allowed_packet equivalent in Postgres? Alan McKay <alan.mckay@gmail.com>
Re: max_allowed_packet equivalent in Postgres? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: max_allowed_packet equivalent in Postgres? Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Re: max_allowed_packet equivalent in Postgres? Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>
Re: max_allowed_packet equivalent in Postgres? Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Re: max_allowed_packet equivalent in Postgres? Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>
Re: max_allowed_packet equivalent in Postgres? Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Sam Mason wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:03:37AM +0100, Greg Stark wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Sam Mason wrote: >> > There would be no way of creating a row 1.6TB in size in one go >.... > I was thinking of a single update per column. Oh, my bad, you did indeed say "row" and I assumed column. Yes, you could create a single row of 1.6TB by doing repeated updates setting one column at a time to a 1G datum. (You would have to be using 32k blocks though) -- greg http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления