On 2023-01-21 Sa 10:00, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2023-01-21 Sa 08:26, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 2023-01-20 Fr 13:19, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>>>> On 2023-01-20 12:09:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>> The core problem here is that requiring that would translate to
>>>>> requiring every code contributor to have a working copy of pg_bsd_indent.
>>>> Wouldn't just every committer suffice?
>>> Not if we have cfbot complaining about it.
>>>
>>> (Another problem here is that there's a sizable subset of committers
>>> who clearly just don't care, and I'm not sure we can convince them to.)
>> I think we could do better with some automation tooling for committers
>> here. One low-risk and simple change would be to provide a
>> non-destructive mode for pgindent that would show you the changes if any
>> it would make. That could be worked into a git pre-commit hook that
>> committers could deploy. I can testify to the usefulness of such hooks -
>> I have one that while not perfect has saved me on at least two occasions
>> from forgetting to bump the catalog version.
>>
>> I'll take a look at fleshing this out, for my own if no-one else's use.
>>
>>
> Here's a quick patch for this. I have it in mind to use like this in a
> pre-commit hook:
>
> # only do this on master
> test `git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD` = "master" || exit 0
>
> src/tools/pgindent/pg_indent --silent `git diff --cached --name-only` || \
>
> { echo "Need a pgindent run" >&2 ; exit 1; }
>
>
> The committer could then run
>
> src/tools/pgindent/pg_indent --show-diff `git diff --cached --name-only`
>
> to see what changes it thinks are needed.
>
>
This time with patch.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com