Peter Eisentraut wrote:<br /><blockquote cite="mid200312082138.54363.peter_e@gmx.net" type="cite"><pre
wrap="">BrendanJurd wrote: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">I have a few projects that could benefit from
inheritedtable
structure, and it's a very cool idea, but this inability of indexes
to include derived tables is a real functionality-killer. It's not
"Object Relational" if the objects can't be related to anything! </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
Hehe, but the "relational" means that the data is stored in relations,
not that the data has to be related to other data.
</pre></blockquote> Fair call<br /><blockquote cite="mid200312082138.54363.peter_e@gmx.net" type="cite"><pre
wrap=""></pre><blockquotetype="cite"><pre wrap="">If someone could give me an idea of how far away this fix is, I'd be
grateful. </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
No one has really expressed intentions to fix this, so I wouldn't hold
my breath.
</pre></blockquote> So it's a case of "if you really want it fixed, fix it yourself"? If only I knew anything about
writingDBMS internals, I would have a shot at it.<br /><br /> /me proceeds to not hold breath<br /><br /> BJ<br />