Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Kurt Roeckx [mailto:Q@ping.be]
>>Sent: 02 December 2003 23:10
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin 1.0.2 Bundled...
>>
>>On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:08:19PM -0000, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi Guys,
>>>
>>>I just finished bundling the source tarball, win32 builds and
>>>Slackware build of v1.0.2. This version is built using the new wx
>>>snapshot, which has also been added to the ftp mirrors.
>>>
>>>
>>I find the changelog on the website rather strange. Are all
>>the lines between "v1.0.0" and "v0.9.3devel" what changed
>>between 1.0.0 and 1.0.2? The dates seems to match.
>>
>>
>
>The header is the version to which changes were applied. E.g.
>
>V1.0.0
>
>- Fixed fnubar widget
>
>Means that we fixed the buggy fnubar widget that was in the 1.0.0
>release.
>
>
I must admit that the current CHANGELOG.txt handling is confusing. We're
displaying the cvs head version, which doesn't necessary reflect what's
in the released version. IMHO we should find a layout that states which
change is applied to cvs, which to trunk and which is released.
Regards,
Andreas