Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Serge Rielau
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Дата
Msg-id 3ECC3C9C-D94F-47DF-B578-909DD1928C23@rielau.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> On Jan 13, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have not clean feeling from this - I am pretty sure so I am afraid schizophrenic  between MODULES, SCHEMAS. Nested
schemasincrease complexity of searching complexity and breaks a logic database.schema.object 
Yes my proposal to nest schemata is “radical” and this community is not falling into that camp.
But there is nothing holy about database.schema.object.attribute
.
>
> Currently almost all in PostgreSQL PL design is primitive, but that means pretty simple too.
We are having > 30,000 functions with a total of millions of lines of code.

You are describing a self fulfilling prophecy here.
As long as the community codebase only caters to its existing users you will not see a change in the usage pattern of
thebase. 

> It is hard to see a advantages of this proposal.

At least I tried :-)

Serge






В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] plan_rows confusion with parallel queries