Re: Why PostgreSQL?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Medi Montaseri
Тема Re: Why PostgreSQL?
Дата
Msg-id 3E664649.3030002@intransa.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Why PostgreSQL?  ("Derrick Rapley" <adrapley@rapleyzone.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Paul Ramsey wrote:

>
>
> However, if you *really* want PgSQL to start looking attractive to
> managers and PHBs, you'll have to get a big company like IBM or HP or
> Sun to start promoting it, as IBM has done Linux. Management-level
> technology decisions are made on the basis of *references*. If
> management can reference a trusted source who promotes the product,
> they can feel safe about choosing it. That trusted source might be
> another manager in the organization, or it might be a big
> multinational IT company giving a stamp of approval.

Would the fact that RedHat has chosen PG on their distribution count ?

>
>
>> My second question is, "Why should I dedicate the time to gain
>> expertise in PostgreSQL?"
>
>
> Because it can't hurt, and because unlike Oracle it doesn't take that
> long to learn. By all means, learn Oracle too, this isn't an either/or
> proposition :)
>
> P.
>




В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_ctl -m fast failing?
Следующее
От: Richard Huxton
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: What about SELECT INTO in EXECUTE