Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >> The right way IMHO would be to give views another relkind.
>
> > This appeals to me.
>
> I like it too. Aside from the advantages Jan mentioned, we could also
> refrain from creating an underlying file for a view, which would be
> nice to avoid cluttering the database directory.
Excellent. I think we have a consensus. I'll start coding in that direction.
Anybody have any thoughts on the upgrade ramification of this change?
--
Mark Hollomon
mhh@nortelnetworks.com
ESN 451-9008 (302)454-9008