Re: Re: dramatic slowdown. . .fixed by vacuum
| От | Andrew McMillan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: dramatic slowdown. . .fixed by vacuum |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3978C233.FB8D8DFC@catalyst.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | RE: dramatic slowdown in selects after pg has been runni ng for a while (patrick.wolf@Aerojet.com (WOLF, PATRICK)) |
| Список | pgsql-novice |
Joe Slag wrote:
>
> I see in the docs the suggestion:
>
> We recommend that active production databases be VACUUMM-ed nightly
>
> Is this how people tend to do their vacuuming? Does anyone do programmatic
> vacuums instead of / in addition to a nightly run? Is vacuuming mainly
> necessary after big deletes, or are there other common situations
> requiring it?
I run vacuum more often than daily on a few tables which have frequent
updates and where I can handle the table lock for the necessary length
of time.
Cheers,
Andrew
--
_____________________________________________________________________
Andrew McMillan, e-mail: Andrew@cat-it.co.nz
Catalyst IT Ltd, PO Box 10-225, Level 22, 105 The Terrace, Wellington
Me: +64 (21) 635 694, Fax: +64 (4) 499 5596, Office: +64 (4) 499 2267
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: