Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 04:27:24PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-2000-05/lw-05-database.html
> > >
> > > It mentions PostgreSQL. I was interviewed for the article.
> >
> > Nice article, but the author should get some facst straight. Postgres was
> > never sold as Ingres. :-)
>
> Yes, he got confused, and never mentioned Illustra.
From the Postgres 4.2 FAQ (still alive....):
http://s2k-ftp.CS.Berkeley.EDU:8000/postgres/postgres-v4r2/postgres.faq
---
Q. What is the connection between POSTGRES and University Ingres?
A. There is none, aside from Prof. Stonebraker. There is no
compatibility between the two software packages, and the research
projects had differing objectives. We do not support University
Ingres at all. Questions about it should be sent to the USENET
newsgroup "comp.databases" or "comp.databases.ingres".
---
It's a common mistake.
-Ronabop
--2D426F70|759328624|00101101010000100110111101110000
Brought to you from iBop the iMac, a MacOS, Win95, Win98, LinuxPPC machine,
which is currently in LinuxPPC land. Your bopping may vary. Do not eat
contents. Cape does not enable wearer to fly. Use only as directed.