Re: ksqo?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: ksqo?
Дата
Msg-id 393.1022104987@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на ksqo?  (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>)
Ответы Re: ksqo?  (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org> writes:
> The current KSQO code is currently #ifdef'ed out, and the 'ksqo' GUC
> variable does nothing. Is there a reason for keeping this code around?
> (or conversely, what was the original justification for disabling it?)

I disabled it because I didn't have time to fix it properly when it got
broken by the 7.1 rewrite of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT.  I've been waiting
to see whether anyone notices that it's gone ;-).  So far the demand for
it has been invisible, so it hasn't gotten fixed.  On the other hand
I'm not quite convinced that it never will get fixed, so I haven't
applied the coup de grace.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Killing dead index tuples before they get vacuumed
Следующее
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
Сообщение: Me in California