Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files

Bill Moran wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>
>> Bill Moran wrote:
>> > +         if (trace_temp_files != -1)
>> >
>>
>> Might be more robust to say
>>
>>     if (trace_temp_files >= 0)
>
> Because it would allow for the easy addition of more negative numbers
> with magic value?
>


because ISTM any negative number here should mean no action is to be
taken. Otherwise how else is it different from 0?

cheers

andrew