2009/9/15 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> I believe the terminology we've been using, at least for the past year
> since I've been involved, is as follows:
>
> Open = open to new patches
> In Progress = working on reviewing and committing patches, no longer
> open to new patches
> Closed = all patches have been dealt with
>
> So, no, 2009-09 was open yesterday. Now it's in progress, and 2009-11 is open.
Yeah, that's what we've been using to date, but I do agree with Stefan
that it's a bit confusing. I think part of the problem is that "open"
and "closed" are normally opposites, but in our case they are talking
about different things.
Perhaps we should move to something like:
Accepting contributions => Under review => Complete.
Cheers,
BJ