RE: Performance TODO items

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mikheev, Vadim
Тема RE: Performance TODO items
Дата
Msg-id 3705826352029646A3E91C53F7189E320166FB@sectorbase2.sectorbase.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Performance TODO items  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Performance TODO items
Список pgsql-hackers
> > > We could use POSIX spinlocks/semaphores now but we
> > > don't because of performance, right?
> > 
> > No. As long as no one proved with test that mutexes are bad for
> > performance...
> > Funny, such test would require ~ 1 day of work.
> 
> Good question. I know the number of function calls to spinlock stuff
> is huge. Seems real semaphores may be a big win on multi-cpu boxes.

Ok, being tired of endless discussions I'll try to use mutexes instead
of spinlocks and run pgbench on my Solaris WS 10 and E4500 (4 CPU) boxes.

Vadim


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance TODO items
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function.