Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Leonardo F
Тема Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Дата
Msg-id 366059.67064.qm@web29018.mail.ird.yahoo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> By the time you make this actually work in all cases, it's probably
> going to be more of a mess than the other way;

I meant to add only ASC/DESC; I would leave all other cases
(non-btrees, custom expression btrees) to use the old index-scan method.

> not to mention that it
> doesn't work *at all* without violating SPI internals.


You lost me there...





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch