Re: WAL & ZFS
От
Holger Jakobs
Тема
Re: WAL & ZFS
Дата
Msg-id
35c98a4b-f7a1-a896-4484-582bbaaffb5b@jakobs.com
Ответ на
Re: WAL & ZFS (Rui DeSousa)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
WAL & ZFS Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Rui DeSousa <rui@crazybean.net>
Re: WAL & ZFS Holger Jakobs <holger@jakobs.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Rui DeSousa <rui@crazybean.net>
Re: WAL & ZFS Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Rui DeSousa <rui@crazybean.net>
Re: WAL & ZFS Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Rui DeSousa <rui@crazybean.net>
Re: WAL & ZFS Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
The WAL is a journal itself and doesn't need another journal for safety. Therefore, a common recommendation is using ext2 (which has no journal) for the WAL partition. Is this correct? Am 31.03.22 um 23:32 schrieb Rui DeSousa: > I would recommend a separate pg_wal filesystem with the record size to match the WAL page size; in my case 16k. I have keep the default record size at 128k for the data volume and that configuration has worked well for supporting large DSS while using 16k data blocks. > >> On Mar 30, 2022, at 5:32 PM, Scott Ribe wrote: >> >> I've read all the info I could find re running PG on ZFS: turn off full page writes, turn on lz4, tweak recordsize so as to take advantage of compression, etc. One thing I haven't seen is whether a separate volume for WAL would benefit from a larger recordsize. Or any other tweaks??? >> >> -- >> Scott Ribe >> scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/ >> >> >> >> >> > > -- Holger Jakobs, Bergisch Gladbach, Tel. +49-178-9759012
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления