Re: WAL & ZFS

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Holger Jakobs
Тема
Re: WAL & ZFS
Дата
Msg-id
35c98a4b-f7a1-a896-4484-582bbaaffb5b@jakobs.com
Ответ на
Re: WAL & ZFS (Rui DeSousa)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
WAL & ZFS Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Rui DeSousa <rui@crazybean.net>
Re: WAL & ZFS Holger Jakobs <holger@jakobs.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Rui DeSousa <rui@crazybean.net>
Re: WAL & ZFS Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Rui DeSousa <rui@crazybean.net>
Re: WAL & ZFS Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Rui DeSousa <rui@crazybean.net>
Re: WAL & ZFS Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
Re: WAL & ZFS Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
The WAL is a journal itself and doesn't need another journal for safety. 
Therefore, a common recommendation is using ext2 (which has no journal) 
for the WAL partition.

Is this correct?

Am 31.03.22 um 23:32 schrieb Rui DeSousa:
> I would recommend a separate pg_wal filesystem with the record size to match the WAL page size; in my case 16k.  I have keep the default record size at 128k for the data volume and that configuration has worked well for supporting large DSS while using 16k data blocks.
>
>> On Mar 30, 2022, at 5:32 PM, Scott Ribe  wrote:
>>
>> I've read all the info I could find re running PG on ZFS: turn off full page writes, turn on lz4, tweak recordsize so as to take advantage of compression, etc. One thing I haven't seen is whether a separate volume for WAL would benefit from a larger recordsize. Or any other tweaks???
>>
>> --
>> Scott Ribe
>> scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-- 
Holger Jakobs, Bergisch Gladbach, Tel. +49-178-9759012

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления
От: Rui DeSousa
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL & ZFS
От: Scott Ribe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL & ZFS
FAQ