Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> 100 << 2^32, so it's not terrible, but I'm honestly coming around to
> the view that we ought to just nuke this test case.
I'd hesitated to suggest that, but I think that's a fine solution.
Especially since we can always put it back in later if we think
of a more robust way.
regards, tom lane