Re: Lc_collate & lc_type? whitespace and nbsp unique index...
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Lc_collate & lc_type? whitespace and nbsp unique index... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3278464.1626198212@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Lc_collate & lc_type? whitespace and nbsp unique index... (Ilmir Mulyukov <ilmir.mulyukov@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Lc_collate & lc_type? whitespace and nbsp unique index...
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
Ilmir Mulyukov <ilmir.mulyukov@gmail.com> writes:
> Laurenz, there is no index for this table.
> ka_im_pg=# \d _inforg31440
> Table "public._inforg31440"
> Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default
> ---------------+---------------+-----------+----------+---------
> _fld31441 | mvarchar(400) | | not null |
> _fld31442 | mvarchar(10) | | not null |
> _fld31443rref | bytea | | not null |
> _fld2102 | numeric(7,0) | | not null |
What in the world is type "mvarchar"? It's certainly not
anything defined by core Postgres. I think you need to
address this question to whoever wrote that datatype.
It seems somewhat likely that this is intentional behavior
for the type.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: