Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler?

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 01:32:22AM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> I'm hoping to get just the regex changes in ASAP, and then take a
>> little bit longer on the recovery conflict patch itself (v6-0005) on
>> the basis that it's bugfix work and not subject to the feature freeze.

> Agreed.  It would be good to check with the RMT, but as long as that's
> not at the middle/end of the beta cycle I guess that's OK for this
> one, even if it is only for HEAD.

Right.  regex changes pass an eyeball check here.

            regards, tom lane