> On 26 Aug 2021, at 15:43, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Le jeu. 26 août 2021 à 21:38, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se <mailto:daniel@yesql.se>> a écrit :
> > On 26 Aug 2021, at 15:09, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us <mailto:bruce@momjian.us>> wrote:
>
> > Basically, pg_upgrade has avoided any backend changes that could be
> > controlled by GUCs and I am not sure we want to start adding such
> > changes for just this.
>
> In principle I think it’s sound to try to avoid backend changes where possible
> without sacrificing robustness.
>
> I agree, but it seems quite more likely that an extension relying on a bgworker changes this guc, compared to an
extensionforcing autovacuum to be on for instance.
Agreed, in this particular case I think there is merit to the idea of enforcing
it in the backend.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/