Re: SESSION SESSION - bug or intentional?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SESSION SESSION - bug or intentional? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 30149.1443649799@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: SESSION SESSION - bug or intentional? ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SESSION SESSION - bug or intentional?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
>> I was looking at something in gram.y when I noticed that the following
>> production works:
>> SET SESSION SESSION CHARACTERISTICS AS TRANSACTION READ ONLY;
>> "SESSION SESSION" seems fairly odd -- is it intentional?
> However, SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION is defined as thus:
> SET [ SESSION | LOCAL ] SESSION AUTHORIZATION user_name
Yeah. SET LOCAL SESSION AUTHORIZATION is valid and useful. The optional
SESSION is just a noise word here, but disallowing it would be
non-orthogonal compared to other similar syntaxes.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: