Re: Lock compatibility matrix

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavan Deolasee
Тема Re: Lock compatibility matrix
Дата
Msg-id 2e78013d0701300306va013260xc423d0ad6bc5dbdc@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Lock compatibility matrix  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-patches

On 1/30/07, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> I had this in a different form, but reworked so that it matches the
> doc patch that Teodor submitted earlier. I think it would be good to
> have this information in the lock.h file as well.

Why would we want to have two redundant copies of the same information?

IMHO its useful to have this information in the source code, just like many
other comments. It improves the readability of the code while documentation
acts as a reference.

But I am not sure whats the generally accepted practice for PostgresQL,
so I may be wrong here.

Thanks,
Pavan

--

EnterpriseDB     http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Lock compatibility matrix
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Phantom Command IDs, updated patch