Re: DROP COLUMN
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: DROP COLUMN |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29989.1026795374@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: DROP COLUMN (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: DROP COLUMN
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Definitely *not*; I don't want to kluge up every call to SearchSysCache
>> with a feature that's only relevant to a small number of them.
> Uh, then what?
Then we make a wrapper function. Something like
GetUndeletedColumnByName(relid,attname)
replaces SearchSysCache(ATTNAME,...) in those places where you don't
want to see deleted columns. It'd return NULL if it finds a column
tuple but sees it's deleted.
GetUndeletedColumnByNum(relid,attnum)
replaces SearchSysCache(ATTNUM,...) similarly.
> My only other idea is to make a syscache that is like ATTNAME except
> that it doesn't return a dropped column.
That would mean duplicate storage of tuples inside the catcache...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: