Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Дата
Msg-id
29939.1090272246@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery (Bruce Momjian)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery markw@osdl.org
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Klaus Naumann <kn@mgnet.de>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Klaus Naumann <kn@mgnet.de>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery "Simon@2ndquadrant.com" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Mark Kirkwood <markir@coretech.co.nz>
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Bruce Momjian writes: > we need to check to see which one has a WAL eof-of-segment marker (we > have on of those, right?). No, we don't. > I think I see a solution. We are going to create a file during backup so > we know the wal offsets and xids. If we see that file, we know either > we have a restore of a backup or they currently running a backup. ... or the last backup attempt failed, but they forgot to remove the file it left. Or we are doing crash recovery after the system lost power while a backup was running. Or half a dozen other obvious scenarios. > If we tell them not to restore while a backup is running (seems pretty > obvious) we can then delete pg_xlog when the backup wal offset file > exists. In other cases, we know the WAL files are valid to use. We're not deleting pg_xlog, period. IMHO it's too dangerous even to have such a function in the code. My original suggestion was to *replace* individual xlog files with data extracted from archive, and only after determining that the archive indeed has a copy of that particular file (and we can fetch it). This at least has a fighting chance of not losing information. Wiping pg_xlog in toto on the basis of a guess about the system status is just a form of russian roulette. Sooner or later you will wipe some xlog files that you can't get back from archive. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления