Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29727.1289248696@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On mån, 2010-11-08 at 15:01 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> First, the buildfarm doesn't build the docs. That's a deliberate
>> decision, based on the fact that not every member has the required
>> software installed. And second these targets only exist for 9.0 and/or
>> later.
> I'm aware of those issues. I'm just saying you could consolidate things
> along those lines in the long term.
Probably not: your proposal depends on having "make" available, which it
won't be for Windows builds. I doubt Andrew wishes to implement
make-equivalent logic in the buildfarm script.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: