Glen Parker <glenebob@nwlink.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... AFAICS what
>> Glen is proposing is to not WAL-log index changes, and with that any
>> crash no matter how minor would have to invalidate indexes.
> Nooo...! This has nothing to do with WAL logging index changes.
How so? In any PITR-based situation it seems to me you need to worry
about the WAL bulk a lot more than the bulk of the base backup.
regards, tom lane