Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> Ah, OK, you meant this file... Yes I was able to receive it as well in your
> original email. I'll try to investigate further later, but Tom may beat me
> first. He usually does.
Jim had indicated the bug wasn't reproducible on the strength of that
info, so I was waiting for him to provide a more reproducible case.
regards, tom lane