Re: trailing comment ghost-timing
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: trailing comment ghost-timing |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29569.1388280059@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: trailing comment ghost-timing (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: trailing comment ghost-timing
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2013-12-24 12:27:59 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What I was proposing was that we do include comments in what we send,
>> as long as those comments are embedded in the statement text, not
>> on lines before it.
> The common way I've seen what I've described above done as is something
> like:
> /* File:path/to/some/file.whatever Function:foo::something()
> * Comment: Expensive, but that's ok!
> */
> SELECT here_comes FROM my WHERE some_sql;
> If I unerstood what you propose correctly, we'd now drop that comment,
> where we sent it before?
Yeah. But I just noticed that this would cause the regression test
results to change dramatically --- right now, most "-- comment" comments
get echoed to the output, and that would stop. So maybe it's not such
a great idea after all.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: