Re: row literal problem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: row literal problem
Дата
Msg-id 29564.1342639805@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: row literal problem  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: row literal problem  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 07/18/2012 03:18 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> there are no null fields, right? if the last field is sometimes null
>> you'd see that (you probably ruled that out though).  when you say
>> 'sometimes', do you mean for some rows and not others? or for some
>> queries?

> No, the inner query has two fields.

> It happens for all rows, but not for all two-field-resulting queries as 
> q. I'm trying to find a simple case rather than the rather complex query 
> my customer is using.

I'm wondering about a rowtype with a third, dropped column.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: row literal problem
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: bgwriter, regression tests, and default shared_buffers settings