Re: row literal problem
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: row literal problem |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29564.1342639805@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: row literal problem (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: row literal problem
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 07/18/2012 03:18 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> there are no null fields, right? if the last field is sometimes null
>> you'd see that (you probably ruled that out though). when you say
>> 'sometimes', do you mean for some rows and not others? or for some
>> queries?
> No, the inner query has two fields.
> It happens for all rows, but not for all two-field-resulting queries as
> q. I'm trying to find a simple case rather than the rather complex query
> my customer is using.
I'm wondering about a rowtype with a third, dropped column.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: