Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> Motivation: A couple of projects propose to add new smgr
> implementations alongside md.c in order to use bufmgr.c for more kinds
> of files, but it seems entirely bogus to extend the unused smgr type
> to cover those.
I agree that smgrtype as it stands is pretty pointless, but what
will we be using instead to get to those other implementations?
regards, tom lane