Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS
Дата
Msg-id 28694.1260801646@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS  (Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Pushing extra arguments around would create overhead of its own ...
>> overhead that would be paid even when not using EXPLAIN at all.

> I cannot understand what you mean... The additional argument should
> not be a performance overhead because the code path is run only once
> per execution.

Hmm, maybe, but still: once you have two flags you're likely to need
more.  I concur with turning doInstrument into a bitmask as per Robert's
suggestion downthread.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: thread safety on clients