Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 00:06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> [ scratches head ... ] �That's weird. �We probably ought to figure out
>> why you and I are getting different results. �I wonder if there's some
>> other discrepancy in the anoncvs pull?

> Could be.

Oh, mystery explained upon comparing the cvs2git.options files.
I was using Max's file which had this in it:
   ExcludeRegexpStrategyRule(r'unlabeled-.*'),

I think I'll rerun without that just to convince myself of what it is
we're dropping.  But right now it seems that everything is pretty sane.
        regards, tom lane