Re: voting to the xslt_process() need

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: voting to the xslt_process() need
Дата
Msg-id 28508.1320688834@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: voting to the xslt_process() need  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Please also see earlier discussions of these items in the mailing list.

Yes.  It's very unlikely that we'll accept a patch that just moves
xslt_process into core without doing anything about its definitional
and implementation shortcomings.  See for instance

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-02/msg01878.php
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: J Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: unaccent extension missing some accents
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits