Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28484.1267200841@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:12:10PM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> Michael, can we try to install the first two patches?
> If I understood the rest of the thread correctly this is not needed anymore,
> right?
I think it would be a good idea, just to have all that code using
identical #includes. R�mi's problem may be a platform bug rather
than something we can fix ourselves, but I think that making sure that
ecpg uses the exact same coding that's been proven in the backend
will forestall problems on other platforms.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: