Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28385.1049174024@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere (John Huttley <john@mwk.co.nz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere
|
| Список | pgsql-interfaces |
John Huttley <john@mwk.co.nz> writes:
> This isn't more that a month or two old.
Okay, it wasn't real clear...
> The previous version worried about nested transactions.
It still should. I see no prospect that nested xacts will be in 7.4,
and I wouldn't care to bet they'll be in the release or two after ...
On a more positive note:
* NUMERIC does indeed do the unspecified-precision thing.
* If you can't be bothered to rename datatypes, CREATE DOMAIN would serve to provide Oracle-compatible names for
Postgresdatatypes. There is some parse-time overhead associated though.
* CREATE OR REPLACE does exist for some object types now --- views and functions for sure, don't recall anything else.
* Postgres *does* do sub-SELECT-in-FROM, which is what I think is meant by the references to embedded views.
* On the outer join syntax issue: PG supports the SQL-standard syntax, which I believe is also supported by recent
Oraclereleases. Consider migrating away from Oracle's proprietary syntax.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: