Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Дата
Msg-id 28236.990242113@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I am confused why we can't implement subtransactions as part of our
> command counter?  The counter is already 4 bytes long.  Couldn't we
> rollback to counter number X-10?

That'd work within your own transaction, but not from outside it.
After you commit, how will other backends know which command-counter
values of your transaction to believe, and which not?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Fix for tablename in targetlist