Re: Passing arguments to views
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Passing arguments to views |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28187.1138993110@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Passing arguments to views (Mark Dilger <pgsql@markdilger.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Passing arguments to views
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Dilger <pgsql@markdilger.com> writes:
> If we are talking about inserting the function definition into the
> query as a subquery and then letting the parser treat it as a
> subquery, then I see no reason to use either the existing function or
> view subsystems. It sounds more like we are discussing a macro
> language.
Which is pretty much what a SQL function is already. I don't see a need
to invent a separate concept. To the extent that macros have different
semantics than functions (eg, multiple evaluation of arguments) the
differences are generally not improvements IMHO ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: