Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate
Дата
Msg-id 28143.1018144735@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Why shouldn't aggregate functions have entries in pg_proc?

> Furthermore, we could make the new function privileges apply to aggregates
> as well.

Good point.  Another thing that would fall out for free is that the
aggregate type-coercion rules would become exactly like the function
type-coercion rules; right now they are a tad stupider.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: timeout implementation issues
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: timeout implementation issues