Re: pgsql: Mention that PAM requires the user already exist in the database,

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pgsql: Mention that PAM requires the user already exist in the database,
Дата
Msg-id 28107.1114492614@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на pgsql: Mention that PAM requires the user already exist in the database,  (momjian@svr1.postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian))
Ответы Re: pgsql: Mention that PAM requires the user already exist in the database,  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-committers
Дерево обсуждения 
momjian@svr1.postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> Mention that PAM requires the user already exist in the database, per
> Dick Davies.

I don't recall exactly what Dick suggested, but the patch as applied
seems like fairly useless verbiage.  Exactly which of our other auth
methods allow users who *don't* exist in the database to log in?
And why would anyone find it surprising that this does not happen?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: momjian@svr1.postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian)
Дата:
Сообщение: pgsql: Mention that PAM requires the user already exist in the database,
Следующее
От: teodor@svr1.postgresql.org (Teodor Sigaev)
Дата:
Сообщение: pgsql: workaround for bug in utils/date.h (timetz)