Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> On 2024-May-17, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Anyone else want to vote?
> I had pretty much the same thought as you. It seems a waste to leave
> the code in existing branches be slow only because we have a much better
> approach for a branch that doesn't even exist yet.
I won't complain too loudly as long as we remember to revert the
patch from HEAD once the ecpg fix goes in.
regards, tom lane